‘The most hated family in America’ is a 2007 Expository documentary
film written and presented by Louis
Theroux about the family at the core of the Westboro
Baptist Church. The organization is led by Fred
Phelps and located in Topeka, Kansas. Westboro Baptist Church members believe that the United
States government is immoral due to its tolerance of homosexuality; in addition, they protest at funerals of U.S.
military killed in action with signs that
display text such as "God Hates Fags" and "Thank God for Dead
Soldiers".
1. Louis Theroux is an interactive
documentary filmmaker. There are few codes and conventions that show this; such
as the fact Louis ‘joins in’ with the families activities like joining them at
church and attending their protests although the family sometimes offends Theroux about his religion. The interviews Louis has the family
members are very informal and on the spot and open answered questions. Another
code and convention of this is that Louis is always visible to the audience.
2. There are a few main subjects in the
documentary; the main subject shown most on screen is Fred Phelps’ daughter
Shirley; she interacts most with Louis and answers most of Louis’ questions.
Then there is Fred Phelps; he isn’t shown on screen as much as Shirley but his
conversations with Louis seem controversial in what he says. Another main
subject is Steve Drain, Steve joined the church in 2001; the former filmmaker was
making a documentary when he decided to move his family to Kansas and joined
Westboro.
3. There are many themes and issues raised
during the documentary. The church is noted for its anti-homosexual speeches, and runs numerous web sites such as GodHatesFags.com,
GodHatesAmerica.com, and others expressing condemnation of homosexuality. There
are also political issues within the documentary; such as the picketing at
soldier’s funerals which have caused a huge amount of controversy worldwide.
4. The crew is very small and consists of
Louis Theroux, a cameraman and a soundman. I think that this is because they
didn’t want to disturb the naturalness of the family’s daily lives. I also think this was because they didn't want to draw anymore attention to the filming than they already had as the family could have been putting on an act.
5. In this documentary there are many codes and
conventions; such as Louis interacts with the family and joins in with their
day-to-day lives. He also observes the subjects while they picket on the
street. In some ways Louis try’s and provokes a response from the people he
interviews, he asks difficult questions in which they usually do not answer.
Fred Phelps is a prime example; when Louis asks about how many children he has,
Fred asks to move on to the next question and then refuses to ask any more
questions. Louis does break the boundaries of documentary by not sticking to
one mode and taking elements of different modes to make his documentary.
6. Louis has one-to-one interviews with the family
members to get their opinions on
their own, his interview techniques are to ask
personal questions. The interviews are also informal, Louis does this because
he wants to get their answers from their heart and not what he thinks are being
put into the family heads. While asking his questions like this, the family gets
very defensive towards the questions which causes the audience and Louis to
think ‘do they really believe what they believe, or have they been
brainwashed’.
7. Louis’s main objectives during filming this
documentary were to understand the family, their views and values, maybe expose
the truth of the family and maybe the little humanity within the church. He wants to provoke the audience and cause
debates from them while watching Louis wanted to question things during the
documentary, such as if Fred Phelps was brainwashing his family into behaving a
certain way and thinking there was only one way; the church’s way. He wanted
the audience to be shocked by what they were saying. Louis also wanted to
create good television, as an audience we like to watch things that will cause
controversy.
8. I would describe this documentary as extremely
provocative and controversial yet effective in the way it was meant to, it gets
the audience talking. I think Louis was a good film-maker for this documentary
as he was open minded while interacting with the family, he didn’t try and
argue with the family or make his
view seem the better one, he took time to hear the
families point of view of why they do what they do, and their opinions. Louis manages to keep
a level, unbiased opinion; even when the family say things that may offend him,
of the family despite their extremism, accompanying them on protests and seeing
their whole belief “system” for what it is.


